2006 Ron Paul 61:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
2006 Ron Paul 61:2
Mr. Speaker, I have taken the time in opposition to this resolution because
I very sincerely believe that resolutions
of this sort actually do more
harm than good. I know that it is very
good to condemn the violence, and I
certainly do agree with that.
2006 Ron Paul 61:3
But I am convinced that when we get involved and send strong messages,
such as this resolution will, that it
ends up expanding the war rather than
diminishing the conflict, and that ultimately
it comes back to haunt us.
2006 Ron Paul 61:4
Generally speaking, I follow a policy in foreign affairs called noninterventionism.
It is not generally acceptable
in this current time that we do this,
but I think there is every reason to
consider it. It certainly was something
that the founders talked about.
2006 Ron Paul 61:5
The Constitution really doesnt authorize us to be the policemen of the
world. And for this reason, we should
talk about it. And that is why I take
this opportunity to do so, with the sincere
belief that we would be better off
with less intervention overseas.
2006 Ron Paul 61:6
The founders talked about that, about rejecting entangling alliances.
And we have been involved in a lot of
entangling alliances since World War I,
especially after World War II, and we
have been doing a lot of things, losing
a lot of men and women and costing a
lot of money; and too often, these
events have come back to haunt us.
There is blow-back from our policy.
2006 Ron Paul 61:7
The policy of interventionism, which I object to, really doesnt work. It is
well intended, and we have these grandiose
plans and schemes to solve the
problems of the world, but if you are
really honest with yourself and you
look at the success and failure, it
doesnt have a good record. I mean, are
you going to defend the great victory
in Korea, the great victory in Vietnam?
And on and on. The great victory
in Iraq?
2006 Ron Paul 61:8
And I see resolutions like this step in the wrong direction. Actually, I believe
it is going to expand the war in the
Middle East.
2006 Ron Paul 61:9
The other reason why I strongly object to interventionism is it costs a lot
of money. And someday we will have to
deal with that. Supplemental bills
come up now to the tune of tens of billions,
and next year, already, they are
planning to come up with another $100
billion for our intervention overseas.
But it is off the regular budgetary
process, so it doesnt meet the budgetary
restraints that we are supposed
to follow. So it becomes emergency
funding, although we have been in Iraq
for 3 years, and with plans to stay endlessly.
We are building permanent
bases in Iraq. So there is a lot of cost,
and eventually that will come home to
haunt us, and it already has.
2006 Ron Paul 61:10
And then there is the problem of unintended consequences. We went into
Iraq for all kinds of reasons, some
disproven, and all well intended, and
who knows what the real motivations
were. But one thing was that we would
gain access to oil, and oil would be produced
and would help pay the bills. Yet
oil, when we went into Iraq was $28 a
barrel. Now it is $75 a barrel. That is an
unintended consequence.
2006 Ron Paul 61:11
We have done more to fall into the trap of what Osama bin Laden wanted
in Iraq than anything else. And actually
we have helped Iran. Iran is
stronger. They have probably already
more influence with the grass roots,
the democratic process in Iraq, than we
do. Those are the kind of unintended
consequences that, on principle, I
strongly object to.
2006 Ron Paul 61:12
I believe that the founders were correct in advocating avoiding entangling
alliances, to have a strong national defense,
to defend this country, I believe
that is just plain common sense. Most
Americans, if you just flat-out put it to
them, think we should not be the policemen
of the world. Do you think we
should be involved in the internal affairs
of other nations? People say no.
We shouldnt do this. The Constitution
doesnt give us the authority to do it.
2006 Ron Paul 61:13
And we now are in the business of maintaining an empire. A noninterventionist
foreign policy concedes up front
that is not our goal. We are not supposed
to be going overseas and building
permanent bases and staying there
endlessly. Even the election campaign
of 2000 was won partially on the foreign
policy issue that, you know, it was said
that we shouldnt be the policemen of
the world and we shouldnt be in nation
building.
2006 Ron Paul 61:14
I think those are good ideas and the American people agree. They didnt object
to it. But each step along the way
we dig a deeper hole for ourselves. And
that is the general philosophic reasons
why I believe nonintervention is beneficial.
Intervention is very, very dangerous.
Later there will be a lot of specifics
that I would like to mention.