HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 3, 2004
The Same Old Failed Policies in Iraq
2004 Ron Paul 37:1
Mr. Speaker, the more
things change, the more they stay the same.
Our allegiances to our allies and friends change constantly.
For a decade, exiled Iraqi Ahmed Chalabi was our chosen
leader-to-be in a
new Iraq.
Championed by Pentagon
neocons and objected to by the State Department, Mr. Chalabi received
more than
100 million U.S. taxpayer dollars as our man designated to be leader of
a new
Iraqi government.
2004 Ron Paul 37:2
But something happened on the way to the coronation.
The State Department finally won out in its struggle with the
Pentagon to
dump Chalabi and his Iraqi National Congress, delivering Iraq to a
competing
exiled group, Dr. Iyad Allawi’s Iraqi National Accord.
But never fear, both groups were CIA supported and both would be
expected
to govern as an American puppet.
And
that’s the problem.
Under the
conditions that currently exist in Iraq, American sponsorship of a
government,
or even United Nations approval, for that matter, will be rejected by a
nationalistic Iraqi people.
2004 Ron Paul 37:3
We never seem to learn, and the Muslim Middle East never forgets.
Our support for the Shah of Iran and Saddam Hussein’s war
against Iran
has never endeared us to the Iranians.
We’re
supposed to be surprised to discover that our close confidant Ahmed
Chalabi
turns out to be a cozy pragmatic friend of Iran.
The CIA may have questioned the authenticity of Iranian
intelligence
passed on to the U.S. by Chalabi, yet still this intelligence was used
eagerly
to promote the pro-war propaganda that so many in Congress and the
nation bought
into.
And now it looks like the
intelligence fed to Chalabi by Iran was deliberately falsified, but
because it
fit in so neatly with the neocon’s determination to remake the entire
Middle
East, starting with a preemptive war against Iraq, it was received
enthusiastically.
2004 Ron Paul 37:4
Inadvertently
we
served the interests of both Iran and Osama bin Laden by eliminating
the very
enemy they despised- Saddam Hussein.
To
the Iranians delight, it was payback time for our allegiance with
Saddam Hussein
against Iran in the 1980s.
2004 Ron Paul 37:5
The serious concern is that
valuable and top-secret U.S. intelligence may well have gone in the
other
direction: to Iran with the help of Chalabi.
2004 Ron Paul 37:6
These
serious
concerns led to the dumping of the heir apparent Chalabi, the arrest of
his
colleagues, and the raid on his home and headquarters to seize
important
documents. The connection between Chalabi and the U.N. food-for-oil
scandal is
yet to be determined.
2004 Ron Paul 37:7
What
a mess!
But no one should be surprised.
Regime
change plans- whether by CIA operations or by preemptive war- almost
always go
badly.
American involvement in
installing the Shah of Iran in the fifties, killing Diem in South
Vietnam in the
sixties, helping Osama bin Laden against the Soviets in the eighties,
assisting
Saddam Hussein against Iran in the eighties, propping up dictators in
many Arab
countries, and supporting the destruction of the Palestinian people all
have had
serious repercussions on American interests including the loss of
American life.
We have wasted hundreds of billions of dollars while the old
wounds in
the Middle East continue to fester.
2004 Ron Paul 37:8
How
many times have
our friends become our enemies and our enemies our friends, making it
difficult
to determine which is which?
Our
relationship with Kadafi in Libya is an example of the silliness of our
policy.
Does his recent “conversion” to our side qualify him for U.S.
assistance?
No one can possibly
predict what our relationship with Kadafi will be in a year or two from
now.
My guess is that he too has a long memory.
And even if he becomes a U.S. stooge, it will only foment
antagonism from
his own people for his cozy relationship with the United States.
Long term, interference in the internal affairs of other nations
doesnt
help us or those we support.
2004 Ron Paul 37:9
Those
who strongly
argue behind the scenes that we must protect “our oil” surely should
have
second thoughts, as oil prices soar over $40 with our current policy of
military
interventionism.
2004 Ron Paul 37:10
The real tragedy is that even those with good intentions who argue the
case for our military presence around the world never achiever their
stated
goals.
Not only do the efforts fall
short, the unintended consequences in life and limb and dollars spent
are always
much greater than ever anticipated.
The
blow back effects literally go on for decades.
2004 Ron Paul 37:11
The
invisible
economic costs are enormous but generally ignored.
A policy of militarism and constant war has huge dollar costs,
which
contribute to the huge deficits, higher interest rates, inflation, and
economic
dislocations.
War cannot raise the
standard of living for the average American.
Participants in the military-industrial complex do benefit,
however.
Now the grand scheme of
physically rebuilding Iraq using
American corporations may well prove profitable to the select few with
political
connections.
2004 Ron Paul 37:12
The
clear failure of
the policy of foreign interventionism followed by our leaders for more
than a
hundred years should prompt a reassessment of our philosophy.
Tactical changes, or relying more on the U.N., will not solve
these
problems.
Either way the burden
will fall on the American taxpayer and the American soldier.
2004 Ron Paul 37:13
The
day is fast
approaching when we no longer will be able to afford this burden. For
now
foreign governments are willing to loan us the money needed to finance
our
current account deficit, and indirectly the cost of our worldwide
military
operations.
It may seem possible
for the moment because we have been afforded the historically unique
privilege
of printing the world’s reserve currency.
Foreigners have been only too willing to take our depreciating
dollars
for their goods.
Economic law
eventually will limit our ability to live off others by credit creation.
Eventually trust in the dollar will be diminished, if not
destroyed.
Those who hold these trillion
plus dollars can hold us
hostage if it’s ever in their interest.
It
may be that economic law and hostility toward the United States will
combine to
precipitate an emotionally charged rejection of the dollar.
2004 Ron Paul 37:14
That’s
when the
true wealth of the country will become self-evident and we will no
longer be
able to afford the extravagant expense of pursuing an American empire.
No nation
has ever been able to finance excessive foreign entanglements and
domestic
entitlements through printing press money and borrowing from abroad.
2004 Ron Paul 37:15
It’s
time we
reconsider the advice of the founding fathers and the guidelines of the
Constitution, which counsel a foreign policy of non-intervention and
strategic
independence.
Setting a good
example is a far better way to spread American ideals than through
force of
arms.
Trading with nations, without
interference by international government regulators, is far better than
sanctions and tariffs that too often plant the seeds of war.
2004 Ron Paul 37:16
The principle of self-determination should be permitted for all nations and all
demographically defined groups.
The
world tolerated the breakup of the ruthless Soviet and Yugoslavian
systems
rather well, even as certain national and ethnic groups demanded
self-determination and independence.
2004 Ron Paul 37:17
This
principle is the
source of the solution for Iraq.
We
should suggest and encourage each of the three groups- the Sunnis, the
Shiites,
and the Kurds- to seek self-government and choose voluntarily whether
they want
to associate with a central government.
2004 Ron Paul 37:18
Instead of the incessant chant about us forcing democracy on others, why not
read our history and see how thirteen nations joined together to form a
loose-knit republic with emphasis on local self-government.
Part of the problem with our effort to re-order Iraq is that the
best
solution is something we have essentially rejected here in the United
States.
It would make a lot more sense to
concentrate on rebuilding
our Republic, emphasizing the principles of private property, free
markets,
trade, and personal liberty here at home rather then pursuing war
abroad.
If this were done, we would not be a militaristic state spending
ourselves into bankruptcy, and government benefits to the untold
thousands of
corporations and special interest would be denied.
2004 Ron Paul 37:19
True
defense is
diminished when money and energy are consumed by activities outside the
scope of
specifically protecting our national security.
Diverting resources away from defense and the protection of our
borders
while antagonizing so many around the world actually serves to expose
us to
greater danger from more determined enemies.
2004 Ron Paul 37:20
A policy of non-intervention and strategic independence is the course we should
take if we’re serious about peace and prosperity.
Liberty works!