H. Con. Res. 398: Expressing The Concern Of Congress Over Irans Development Of The Means To Produce Nuclear Weapons
17 May 2004
HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Monday, May 17, 2004
2004 Ron Paul 34:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this ill-conceived and ill-timed legislation.
Lets not fool ourselves: this concurrent
resolution leads us down the road to war
against Iran. It creates a precedent for future
escalation, as did similar legislation endorsing
regime change in Iraq back in 1998.
2004 Ron Paul 34:2
I find it incomprehensible that as the failure of our Iraq policy becomes more evident —
even to its most determined advocates — we
here are approving the same kind of policy toward
Iran. With Iraq becoming more of a problem
daily, the solution as envisioned by this
legislation is to look for yet another fight. And
we should not fool ourselves: this legislation
sets the stage for direct conflict with Iran. The
resolution calls upon all State Parties to the
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear
Weapons (NPT), including the United States,
to use all appropriate means to deter, dissuade,
and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear
weapons . . . Note the phrase use all
appropriate means.
2004 Ron Paul 34:3
Additionally, this legislation calls for yet more and stricter sanctions on Iran, including
a demand that other countries also impose
sanctions on Iran. As we know, sanctions are
unmistakably a move toward war, particularly
when, as in this legislation, a demand is made
that the other nations of the world similarly
isolate and blockade the country. Those who
wish for a regime change in Iran should especially
reject sanctions — just look at how our
Cuba policy has allowed Fidel Castro to maintain
his hold on power for decades. Sanctions
do not hurt political leaders, as we know most
recently from our sanctions against Iraq, but
rather sow misery among the poorest and
most vulnerable segments of society. Dictators
do not go hungry when sanctions are imposed.
2004 Ron Paul 34:4
It is somewhat ironic that vie are again meddling in Iranian affairs. Students of history will
recall that the U.S. governments ill-advised
coup against Iranian leader Mohammed
Mossadegh in 1953 and its subsequent installation
of the Shah as the supreme ruler led to
intense hatred of the United States and eventually
to the radical Islamic revolution of 1979.
One can only wonder what our relations would
be with Iran if not for the decades of meddling
in that countrys internal affairs. We likely
would not be considering resolutions such as
this. Yet the solution to all the difficulties created
by our meddling foreign policy always
seems to be yet more meddling. Will Congress
ever learn?
2004 Ron Paul 34:5
I urge my colleagues to reject this move toward war with Iran, to reject the failed policies
of regime-change and nation-building, and to
return to the wise and consistent policy of
non-interventionism in the affairs of other sovereign
nations.