2004 Ron Paul 19:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H. Res. 557. I do so obviously not because
I oppose praising our armed forces, but because
our policy in the Persian Gulf is seriously
flawed and an effort to commend our
forces should not be used to rubber-stamp a
policy of folly. To do so is disingenuous.
Though this resolution may yield political benefits
to those who are offering it, it will prove
to be historically inaccurate. Justifying preemption
is not the answer to avoiding appeasement.
2004 Ron Paul 19:2
Very few wars are necessary. Very few wars are good and just, including this one. In
reality, most wars are costly beyond measure
in life and limb and economic hardship, including
this one. There have been 566 deaths,
10,000 casualties, and hundreds of billions of
dollars for a victory that remains elusive.
Rather than bragging of victory we should recognize
that the war that rages on has intensified
and spread, leaving our allies and our
own people less safe.
2004 Ron Paul 19:3
Denying that we are interested in oil and that occupying an Islamic country is not an affront
to the sensitivities of most Arabs and
Muslims is foolhardy. Reasserting U.N. Security
Council resolutions as the justification for
war further emphasizes our sacrifice of sovereignty
and Congresss reneging on its Constitutional
responsibility on war.
2004 Ron Paul 19:4
This resolution seems to forget that for too long we were staunch military and economic
allies of Saddam Hussein. This in itself only
demonstrates the folly of our policy of foreign
meddling over many decades from the days of
the U.S. installing the Shah of Iran to the current
world-wide spread of hostilities and hatred,
our unnecessary intervention abroad
shows so clearly how unintended consequences
come back to haunt generation
after generation.
2004 Ron Paul 19:5
Someday our leaders ought to ask why Switzerland, Sweden, Canada, Mexico and
many other nations are not potential targets of
an attack by Islamic extremists.
2004 Ron Paul 19:6
Falsely claiming that al-Qaeda was aligned with Saddam Hussein and using this as a rallying
cry to war has now resulted in al-Qaeda
actually having a strong presence and influence
in Iraq. Falsely claiming that Iraq had a
supply of weapons of mass destruction has resulted
in a dramatic loss of U.S. credibility, as
anti-Americanism spreads around the world.
As a result of this, al-Qaeda recruitment sadly
has been dramatically boosted.
2004 Ron Paul 19:7
That Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator was never in question, so reaffirming it here is
unnecessary. What we must keep in mind,
however, is that Saddam Hussein was attacking
his own people and making war on Iran
when he was essentially an ally of the United
States — to the point where the U.S. Government
assisted him in his war on Iran. This
support is made all the more clear when viewing
recently-declassified State Department cables
in the days after Donald Rumsfeld traveled
to Iraq as a U.S. envoy in 1983. Here are
two such examples:
2004 Ron Paul 19:8
(1) United States Embassy in the United Kingdom Cable from Charles H. Price II to the
Department of State. Rumsfeld One-on-One
Meeting with Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister, December
21, 1983.
2004 Ron Paul 19:9
Presidential envoy Donald Rumsfeld and
Tariq Aziz meet for two and one-half hours
and agree that the U.S. and Iraq shared
many common interests, including peace in
the Persian Gulf, the desire to diminish the
influence of Iran and Syria, and support for
reintegrating Egypt, isolated since its unilateral
peace with Israel, into the Arab
world. Rumsfeld comments on Iraqs oil exports,
suggests alternative pipeline facilities,
and discusses opposition to international
terrorism and support for a fair
Arab-Israeli peace. He and Aziz discuss the
Iran-Iraq war in detail. Rumsfeld says
that the administration wants an end to the
war, and offers our willingness to do more.
He mentions chemical weapons, possible escalation
of fighting in the Gulf, and human
rights as impediments to the U.S. governments
desire to do more to help Iraq, then
shifts the conversation to U.S. opposition to
Syrias role in Lebanon.
2004 Ron Paul 19:10
(2) Department of State, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern and South
Asian Affairs Action Memorandum from Richard
W. Murphy to Lawrence S. Eagleburger.
EXIM [Export-Import] Bank Financing for
Iraq [Includes Letter From Lawrence S.
Eagleburger to William Draper, Dated December
24, 1983], December 22, 1983.
2004 Ron Paul 19:11
Pursuant to the Reagan administrations
policy of increasing support for Iraq, the
State Department advises Under Secretary
of State for Political Affairs Lawrence
Eagleburger to urge the U.S. Export-Import
Bank to provide Iraq with financial credits.
Eagleburger signs a letter to Eximbank saying
that since Saddam Hussein had complied
with U.S. requests, and announced the end of
all aid to the principal terrorist group of
concern to the U.S., and expelled its leader
(Abu Nidal), The terrorism issue, therefore,
should no longer be an impediment to EXIM
financing for U.S. sales to Iraq. The financing
is to signal U.S. belief in Iraqs future
economic viability, secure a foothold in the
potentially large Iraqi market, and go far
to show our support for Iraq in a practical,
neutral context.
2004 Ron Paul 19:12
This resolution praises the new constitution for Iraq, written by U.S. experts and appointees.
No one stops to consider the folly of
the U.S. and the West believing they can write
a constitution for a country with a completely
different political and social history than ours.
The constitution that the occupying forces
have come up with is unworkable and absurd.
It also will saddle the Iraqi people with an
enormous and socialist-oriented government.
In this, we are doing the Iraqi people no favor.
2004 Ron Paul 19:13
Article 14 of the new constitution grants the Iraqi people the right to security, education,
health care, and social security, and affirms
that the Iraqi state . . . shall strive to provide
prosperity and employment opportunities to
the people. This sounds more like the constitution
of the old USSR than that of a free
and market-oriented society.
Further, this constitution declares that Iraqi
citizens shall not be permitted to possess,
bear, buy, or sell arms except by special license
— denying the right of self defense to the
Iraqi people just as their security situation continues
to deteriorate. The Iraqi constitution
also sets up a quota system for the Iraqi electoral
system, stating that women should constitute
no less than one-quarter of the members
of the National Assembly. Is this kind of
social engineering in Iraq on very left-liberal
lines really appropriate? Are we doing the Iraqi
people any favors with this approach?
2004 Ron Paul 19:14
We all praise our troops and support them. Had this bill merely done that I would have
been an enthusiastic supporter. But in politicizing
the issue rather than simply praising the
armed forces, I regret that I cannot support it.
Challenging ones patriotism for not supporting
this resolution and our policy in the Persian
Gulf, however, is not appropriate.
2004 Ron Paul 19:15
We should all be cautious in endorsing and financing a policy that unfortunately expands
the war rather than ending it. That, sadly, is
what this legislation does.