HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 4, 2004
Congress Abandoned its Duty to Debate and Declare War
2004 Ron Paul 1:1
There is plenty of blame to go around for the mistakes made
by going to war in Iraq, especially now that it is common knowledge
Saddam
Hussein told the truth about having no weapons of mass destruction, and
that Al
Qaida and 9/11 were in no way related to the Iraqi government.
2004 Ron Paul 1:2
Our intelligence agencies failed for whatever reason this
time, but their frequent failures should raise the question of whether
or not
secretly spending forty billion taxpayer dollars annually gathering bad
information is a good investment.
The
administration certainly failed us by making the decision to sacrifice
so much
in life and limb, by plunging us into this Persian Gulf quagmire that
surely
will last for years to come.
2004 Ron Paul 1:3
But before Congress gets too carried away with condemning
the administration or the intelligence gathering agencies, it ought to
look to
itself.
A proper investigation and
debate by this Congress — as we’re now scrambling to accomplish —
clearly was
warranted prior to any decision to go to war.
An open and detailed debate on a proper declaration of war
certainly
would have revealed that U.S. national security was not threatened —
and the
whole war could have been avoided.
Because
Congress did not do that, it deserves the greatest criticism for its
dereliction
of duty.
2004 Ron Paul 1:4
There was a precise reason why the most serious decision
made by a country — the decision to go to war — was assigned in our
Constitution
to the body closest to the people.
If we
followed this charge I’m certain fewer wars would be
fought, wide support would be achieved for just defensive wars, there
would be
less political finger-pointing if events went badly, and blame could
not be
placed on one individual or agency.
This
process would more likely achieve victory, which has eluded us in
recent
decades.
2004 Ron Paul 1:5
The president reluctantly has agreed to support an
independent commission to review our intelligence gathering failures,
and that
is good.
Cynics said nothing much
would be achieved by studying pre-9/11 intelligence failures, but it
looks like
some objective criticisms will emerge from that inquiry.
We can hope for the best from this newly appointed
commission.
2004 Ron Paul 1:6
But already we hear the inquiry will be deliberately
delayed, limited to investigating only the failures of the intelligence
agencies
themselves, and may divert its focus to studying intelligence gathering
related
to North Korea and elsewhere.
If
the commission avoids the central controversy — whether or not there
was
selective use of information or undue pressure put on the CIA to
support a
foregone conclusion to go to war by the administration — the commission
will
appear a sham.
2004 Ron Paul 1:7
Regardless of the results, the process of the inquiry is
missing the most important point — the failure of Congress to meet its
responsibility on the decision to go, or not go, to war.
The current mess was predictable from the beginning.
Unfortunately, Congress voluntarily gave up its prerogative over
war and
illegally transferred this power to the president in October of 2002.
The debate we are having now should have occurred here in the
halls of
Congress then.
We should have
debated a declaration of war resolution.
Instead,
Congress chose to transfer this decision-making power to the president
to avoid
the responsibility of making the hard choice of sending our young
people into
harms way, against a weak, third world country.
This
the president did on his own, with congressional
acquiescence.
The blame game
has emerged only now that we are in the political season.
Sadly, the call for and the appointment of the commission is
all part of this political process.
2004 Ron Paul 1:8
It is truly disturbing to see many who abdicated their congressional responsibility to declare or reject war, who timidly voted to give the
president
the power he wanted, now posturing as his harshest critics.