2003 Ron Paul 46:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, at a time of war Congress has no more important duty than to
make sure that our military force have all the
resources they need. However, Congress also
has a duty to not use the war as cover for unnecessary
and unconstitutional spending. This
is especially true when war coincides with a
period of economic downturn and growing federal
deficits. Unfortunately, Congress today is
derelict in its duty to the United States taxpayer.
Instead of simply ensuring that our military
has the necessary resources to accomplish
its mission in Iraq, a mission which may
very well be over before this money reaches
the Pentagon, Congress has loaded this bill
up with unconstitutional wasteful foreign aid
and corporate welfare spending.
2003 Ron Paul 46:2
For example, this bill provides a hidden subsidy to vaccine manufacturers by transferring
liability for injuries caused by the smallpox
vaccine from the companies to the United
States Taxpayer. It also provides $3.2 billion
dollars for yet another government bailout of
the airline industry, as well as a hidden subsidy
to the airlines in the form of $235 million
of taxpayer money to pay for costs associated
with enhanced baggage screening. Mr. Speaker,
there is no more constitutional reason for
the taxpayer to protect what is, after all, the
airlines private property, than there is for the
taxpayer to subsidize security costs at shopping
malls or factories. Furthermore, the airlines
could do a more efficient and effective
job at providing security if they were freed
from government rules and regulations. I remind
my colleagues that it was government
bureaucrats who disarmed airline pilots, thus
leaving the pilots of the planes used in the
September 11 attacks defenseless against the
terrorists. I would also remind my colleagues
that anti-gun fanatics in the federal bureaucracy
continue to prevent pilots from carrying
firearms.
2003 Ron Paul 46:3
Although generous to certain corporate interests, this bill actually contains less money
than the administration requested for homeland
security. One area of homeland security
that Congress did not underfund is its own security;
this bill provides the full amount requested
to ensure the security of the Congress.
Still, one could reasonably conclude
from reading this bill that the security of Turkey,
Pakistan, and Jordan are more important
to Congress that the security of Houston, New
York and other major American cities.
2003 Ron Paul 46:4
On foreign spending, this bill actually provides one billion dollars in foreign aid to Turkey
— even though that country refused the
U.S. request for cooperation in the war on
Iraq. One billion dollars to a country that
thumbed its nose at an American request for
assistance? How is this possibly an appropriate
expenditure of taxpayer money? Additionally,
this war supplemental has provided
cover for more of the same unconstitutional
foreign aid spending. It provides 2.5 billion dollar
for Iraqi reconstruction when Americans
have been told repeatedly that reconstruction
costs will be funded out of Iraqi oil revenues.
It also ensures that the American taxpayer will
subsidize large corporations that wish to do
business in Iraq by making transactions with
Iraq eligible for support from the Export-Import
Bank. It sends grants and loans in excess of
11.5 billion dollars to Jordan, Israel, Egypt,
and Afghanistan — above and beyond the
money we already send them each year.
2003 Ron Paul 46:5
Incredibly, this bill sends 175 million dollars in aid to Pakistan even though it was reported
in April that Pakistan purchased ballistic missiles
from North Korea! Furthermore, it is difficult
to understand how $100 million to Colombia,
$50 million to the Gaza Strip, and
$200 million for Muslim outreach has anything
to do with the current war in Iraq. Also,
this bill spends $31 million to get the federal
government into the television broadcasting
business in the Middle East. With private
American news networks like CNN available
virtually everywhere on the globe, is there any
justification to spend taxpayer money to create
and fund competing state-run networks? Arent
state-run news networks one of the features of
closed societies we have been most critical of
in the past?
2003 Ron Paul 46:6
In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, H.R. 1559 endangers Americas economy by engaging in
pork-barrel spending and corporate welfare
unrelated to national security. This bill endangers
Americas economic health by adding almost
$80 billion to the already bloated federal
deficit. Additions to the deficit endanger our financial
independence because America will
have to increase its reliance on foreign borrowers
to finance our debt. H.R. 1599 also
shortchanges Americans by giving lower priority
to funding homeland security than to
funding unreliable allies and projects, like the
Middle Eastern TV Network, that will do nothing
to enhance Americas security. Therefore,
I must oppose this bill.