HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 7, 2003
Stop Identity Theft – Make Social Security Numbers Confidential
2003 Ron Paul 4:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, today I introduce the Identity Theft Prevention Act. This
act protects the American people from government-mandated uniform
identifiers
that facilitate private crime as well as the abuse of liberty. The
major
provision of the Identity Theft Prevention Act halts the practice of
using the
Social Security number as an identifier by requiring the Social
Security
Administration to issue all Americans new Social Security numbers
within five
years after the enactment of the bill. These new numbers will be the
sole legal
property of the recipient and the Social Security administration shall
be
forbidden to divulge the numbers for any purposes not related to Social
Security
administration. Social Security numbers issued before implementation of
this
bill shall no longer be considered valid federal identifiers. Of
course, the
Social Security Administration shall be able to use an individuals
original
Social Security number to ensure efficient administration of the Social
Security
system.
2003 Ron Paul 4:2
Mr. Speaker, Congress has a moral responsibility to address this problem
because it was Congress which transformed the Social Security number
into a
national identifier. Thanks to Congress, today no American can get a
job, open a
bank account, get a professional license, or even get a drivers
license without
presenting their Social Security number. So widespread has the use of
the Social
Security number become that a member of my staff had to produce a
Social
Security number in order to get a fishing license!
2003 Ron Paul 4:3
One of the most disturbing abuses of the Social Security number is the
congressionally-authorized rule forcing parents to get a Social
Security number
for their newborn children in order to claim them as dependents.
Forcing parents
to register their children with the state is more like something out of
the
nightmares of George Orwell than the dreams of a free republic which
inspired
this nations founders.
2003 Ron Paul 4:4
Congressionally-mandated use of the Social Security number as an identifier
facilitates the horrendous crime of identity theft. Thanks to Congress,
an
unscrupulous person may simply obtain someones Social Security number
in order
to access that persons bank accounts, credit cards, and other
financial assets.
Many Americans have lost their life savings and had their credit
destroyed as a
result of identity theft- yet the federal government continues to
encourage such
crimes by mandating use of the Social Security number as a uniform ID!
2003 Ron Paul 4:5
This act also forbids the federal government from creating national ID cards
or establishing any identifiers for the purpose of investigating,
monitoring,
overseeing, or regulating private transactions between American
citizens, as
well as repealing those sections of the Health Insurance Portability
and
Accountability Act of 1996 that require the Department of Health and
Human
Services to establish a uniform standard health identifier. By putting
an end to
government-mandated uniform IDs, the Identity Theft Prevention Act will
prevent
millions of Americans from having their liberty, property and privacy
violated
by private-and-public sector criminals.
2003 Ron Paul 4:6
In addition to forbidding the federal government from creating national
identifiers, this legislation forbids the federal government from
blackmailing
states into adopting uniform standard identifiers by withholding
federal funds.
One of the most onerous practices of Congress is the use of federal
funds
illegitimately taken from the American people to bribe states into
obeying
federal dictates.
2003 Ron Paul 4:7
Mr. Speaker, of all the invasions of privacy proposed in the past decade,
perhaps the most onerous is the attempt to assign every American a
unique
health identifier — an identifier which could be used to create a
national
database containing the medical history of all Americans. As an OB/GYN
with more
than 30 years in private practice, I know the importance of preserving
the
sanctity of the physician-patient relationship. Oftentimes, effective
treatment
depends on a patients ability to place absolute trust in his or her
doctor.
What will happen to that trust when patients know that any and all
information
given to their doctor will be placed in a government accessible
database?
Some members of Congress may claim that the federal monitoring of all
Americans
will enhance security. However, the fact is that creating a
surveillance state
will divert valuable resources away from investigating legitimate
security
threats into spying on innocent Americans, thus reducing security. The
American
people would be better served if the government focused attention on
ensuring
our borders are closed to potential terrorists instead of coming up
with new
ways to violate the rights of American citizens.
2003 Ron Paul 4:8
Other members of Congress will claim that the federal government needs the
power to monitor Americans in order to allow the government to operate
more
efficiently. I would remind my colleagues that in a constitutional
republic, the
people are never asked to sacrifice their liberties to make the job of
government officials easier. We are here to protect the freedom of the
American
people, not to make privacy invasion more efficient.
2003 Ron Paul 4:9
Mr. Speaker, while I do not question the sincerity of those members who
suggest that Congress can ensure that citizens rights are protected
through
legislation restricting access to personal information, the only
effective
privacy protection is to forbid the federal government from mandating
national
identifiers. Legislative privacy protections are inadequate to
protect
the liberty of Americans for several reasons:
2003 Ron Paul 4:10
First, it is simply common sense that repealing those federal laws that
promote identity theft is more effective in protecting the public than
expanding
the power of the federal police force. Federal punishment of identity
thieves
provides cold comfort to those who have suffered financial losses and
the
destruction of their good reputation as a result of identity theft.
2003 Ron Paul 4:11
Federal laws are not only ineffective in stopping private criminals, but have
not even stopped unscrupulous government officials from accessing
personal
information. After all, laws purporting to restrict the use of personal
information did not stop the well-publicized violations of privacy by
IRS
officials or the FBI abuses by the Clinton and Nixon administrations.
2003 Ron Paul 4:12
Just last month, thousands of active-duty soldiers and veterans had their
personal information stolen, putting them at risk of identity theft.
Imagine the
dangers if thieves are able to obtain the universal identifier, and
other
personal information, of millions of Americans simply by breaking, or
hacking,
into one government facility or one government database?
2003 Ron Paul 4:13
Second, the federal government has been creating proprietary interests in
private information for certain state-favored special interests.
Perhaps the
most outrageous example of phony privacy protection is the medical
privacy
regulation, which allows medical researchers, certain business
interests, and
law enforcement officials access to health care information, in
complete
disregard of the Fifth Amendment and the wishes of individual patients!
Obviously, privacy protection laws have proven greatly inadequate to
protect personal information when the government is the one providing
or seeking
the information.
2003 Ron Paul 4:14
The primary reason why any action short of the repeal of laws authorizing
privacy violations is insufficient is because the federal government
lacks
constitutional authority to force citizens to adopt a universal
identifier for
health care, employment, or any other reason. Any federal action that
oversteps
constitutional limitations violates liberty because it ratifies the
principle
that the federal government, not the Constitution, is the ultimate
judge of its
own jurisdiction over the people. The only effective protection of the
rights of
citizens is for Congress to follow Thomas Jeffersons advice and bind
(the
federal government) down with the chains of the Constitution.
2003 Ron Paul 4:15
Mr. Speaker, those members who are not persuaded by the moral and constitutional reasons for embracing the Identity Theft Prevention Act
should
consider the opposition of the American people toward national
identifiers. The
overwhelming public opposition to the various Know-Your-Customer
schemes, the attempt to turn drivers licenses into National ID cards,
as well
as the numerous complaints over the ever-growing uses of the Social
Security
number, show that American people want Congress to stop invading their
privacy.
Furthermore, according to a survey by the Gallup company, 91 percent of
the
American people oppose forcing Americans to obtain a universal health
ID.
Several other recent polls show most Americans remain skeptical that a
national
ID card would enhance their security or preserve their liberty.
2003 Ron Paul 4:16
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I once again call on my colleagues to join me in
putting an end to the federal governments unconstitutional use of
national
identifiers to monitor the actions of private citizens. National
identifiers
threaten all Americans by exposing them to the threat of identity theft
by
private criminals and abuse of their liberties by public criminals,
while
diverting valuable law enforcement resources away from addressing real
threats
to public safety. In addition, national identifiers are incompatible
with a
limited, constitutional government. I, therefore, hope my colleagues
will join
my efforts to protect the freedom of their constituents by supporting
the
Identity Theft Prevention Act.