2002 Ron Paul 87:1
Mr. Speaker, I have for years
advocated a moral and constitutional approach to our foreign
policy. This has been done in the sincerest belief that a policy
of peace, trade, and friendship with all nations is far superior in all
respects to a policy of war, protectionism, and confrontation. But in
the Congress I find, with regards to foreign affairs, no
interest in following the precepts of the Constitution and the advice
of our early Presidents.
2002 Ron Paul 87:2
Interventionism, internationalism, inflationism, protectionism,
jingoism, and bellicosity are much more popular in our
nations capital than a policy of restraint.
2002 Ron Paul 87:3
I have heard all the arguments on why we must immediately invade and
occupy Iraq and have observed that there are only a
few hardy souls left in the Congress who are trying to stop this
needless, senseless, and dangerous war. They have adequately
refuted every one of the excuses for this war of aggression; but,
obviously, either no one listens, or the unspoken motives for
this invasion silence those tempted to dissent.
2002 Ron Paul 87:4
But the tragic and most irresponsible excuse for the war rhetoric
is now emerging in the political discourse. We now hear
rumblings that the vote is all about politics, the November elections,
and the control of the U.S. Congress, that is, the main
concern is political power. Can one imagine delaying the
declaration
of war against Japan after Pearl Harbor for political reasons? Or can
one imagine
forcing a vote on the issue of war before an election for political
gain? Can anyone believe there are those who would foment
war rhetoric for political gain at the expense of those who are called
to fight and might even die if the war does not go as
planned?
2002 Ron Paul 87:5
I do not want to believe it is possible, but rumors are rampant
that looking weak on the war issue is considered to be
unpatriotic and a risky political position to take before the November
elections. Taking pleasure in the fact that this might place
many politicians in a difficult position is a sobering thought
indeed.
2002 Ron Paul 87:6
There is a bit of irony over all of this political posturing on a
vote to condone a war of aggression and force some Members
into a tough vote. Guess what, contrary to conventional wisdom, war is
never politically beneficial to the politicians who
promote it. Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt were reelected by
promising to stay out of war. Remember, the party in power during the
Korean War was routed in 1952 by a general who promised to stop the
bloodshed. Vietnam, which started with overwhelming
support and hype and jingoistic fervor, ended President Johnsons
political career in disgrace and humiliation. The most
significant plight on the short term of President Kennedy was his
effort at regime change in Cuba and the fate he met at the Bay
of Pigs. Even Persian Gulf War I, thought at the time to be a
tremendous victory, with its aftermath still lingering, did not serve
President Bush, Sr.s reelection efforts in 1992.
2002 Ron Paul 87:7
War is not politically beneficial for two reasons: innocent people die,
and the economy is always damaged. These two things,
after the dust settles from the hype and the propaganda, always make
the people unhappy. The euphoria associated with the
dreams of grandiose and painless victories is replaced by the stark
reality of death, destruction, and economic pain. Instead of
euphoria, we end up with heartache as we did after the Bay of Pigs,
Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, and Lebanon.
2002 Ron Paul 87:8
Since no one wants to hear anymore of morality and
constitutionality and justice, possibly some will listen to the
politics of
war, since that is what drives so many. A token victory at the polls
this fall by using a vote on the war as a lever will be to little
avail. It may not even work in the short run. Surely, history shows
that war is never a winner, especially when the people who
have to pay, fight, and die for it come to realize that the war was not
even necessary and had nothing to do with national
security or fighting for freedom, but was promoted by special interests
who stood to gain from taking over a sovereign country.
2002 Ron Paul 87:9
Mr. Speaker, peace is always superior to war; it is also a political
winner.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr091802.htm