2001 Ron Paul 7:1
The beginning of the 21st
Century lends itself to a reassessment of our history and gives us an
opportunity to redirect our countrys future course if deemed prudent.
2001 Ron Paul 7:2
The main question
before the new Congress and the Administration is: Are we to have
gridlock or cooperation? Today we refer to cooperation as bipartisanship.
Some argue that bipartisanship is absolutely necessary for the American
democracy
to survive. The media never mention a concern for the survival of the
Republic. But there are those who argue that left-wing interventionism
should give no ground to right-wing interventionism-that too much is at
stake.
2001 Ron Paul 7:3
The media are
demanding the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress
immediately yield to those insisting on higher taxes and more federal
government intervention for the sake of national unity, because
our government is neatly split between two concise philosophic views.
But if one looks closely, one is more likely to find only a variation
of a single system of authoritarianism, in contrast to the rarely
mentioned constitutional, non-authoritarian approach to government.
2001 Ron Paul 7:4
The big debate
between the two factions in Washington boils down to nothing more than
a contest over power and political cronyism, rather than any deep
philosophic differences.
2001 Ron Paul 7:5
The feared gridlock
anticipated for the 107th Congress will differ little from the other
legislative battles in recent previous congresses. Yes, there will be
heated arguments regarding the size of budgets, local vs. federal
control, and private vs. government solutions. But a serious debate
over the precise role for government is unlikely to occur. I do not
expect any serious challenge to the 20th Century consensus of both
major parties-that the federal government has a significant
responsibility to deal with education, health care, retirement
programs, or managing the distribution of the welfare state benefits.
Both parties are in general agreement on monetary management,
environmental protection, safety and risks both natural and man-made.
Both participate in telling others around the world how they must adopt
a democratic process similar to ours, as we police our
worldwide financial interests.
2001 Ron Paul 7:6
We can expect most of the
media-directed propaganda to be designed to speed up and broaden the
role of the federal government in our lives and the economy.
Unfortunately, the token opposition will not present a principled
challenge to big government, only an argument that we must move more
slowly and make an effort to allow greater local decision-making.
Without presenting a specific philosophic alternative to authoritarian
intervention from the left, the opposition concedes that the principle
of government involvement per se is proper, practical, and
constitutional.
2001 Ron Paul 7:7
The cliche Third Way
has been used to define the so-called compromise between the
conventional wisdom of the conservative and liberal firebrands. This
nice-sounding compromise refers not only to the noisy rhetoric we hear
in the US Congress but also in Britain, Germany, and other nations as
well. The question, though, remains: Is there really anything new being
offered? The demand for bipartisanship is nothing more than a
continuation of the Third-Way movement of the last several decades.
2001 Ron Paul 7:8
The effort always
is to soften the image of the authoritarians who see a need to run the
economy and regulate peoples lives, while pretending not to give up
any of the advantages of the free market or the supposed benefits that
come from a compassionate-welfare or a socialist government. Its
nothing more than political have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too
deception. Many insecure and wanting citizens cling to the notion that
they can be taken care of through government benevolence without
sacrificing the free market and personal liberty. Those who anxiously
await next months government check prefer not to deal with the
question of how goods and services are produced and under what
political circumstances they are most efficiently provided. Sadly,
whether personal freedom is sacrificed in the process is a serious
concern for only a small number of Americans.
2001 Ron Paul 7:9
The Third Way,
a bipartisan compromise that sounds less confrontational and
circumvents the issue of individual liberty, free markets, and
production is an alluring, but dangerous, alternative. The harsh
reality is that it is difficult to sell the principles of liberty to
those who are dependent on government programs. And this includes both
the poor beneficiaries as well as the self-serving wealthy elites who
know how to benefit from government policies. The authoritarian
demagogues are always anxious to play on the needs of people made
dependent by a defective political system of government intervention
while perpetuating their own power. Anything that can help the people
to avoid facing the reality of the shortcomings of the welfare/warfare
state is welcomed. Thus our system is destined to perpetuate itself
until the immutable laws of economics bring it to a halt at the expense
of liberty and prosperity.
2001 Ron Paul 7:10 Third Way
compromise, or bipartisan cooperation, can never reconcile the
differences between those who produce and those who live off others. It
will only make it worse. Theft is theft, and forced redistribution of
wealth is just that. The Third Way, though, can deceive and
perpetuate an unworkable system when both major factions endorse the
principle.
2001 Ron Paul 7:11
In the last session
of the Congress, the Majority Party, with bipartisan agreement,
increased the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education
appropriations by 26% over the previous year, nine times the rate of
inflation. The Education Department alone received $44 billion, nearly
double Clintons first educational budget of 1993. The Labor, HHS, and
Education appropriation was $34 billion more than the Republican budget
had authorized.
2001 Ron Paul 7:12
Already the spirit
of bipartisanship has prompted the new president to request another $10
billion, along with many more mandates on public schools. This is a far
cry from the clear constitutional mandate that neither the Congress nor
the federal courts have any authority to be involved in public
education.
2001 Ron Paul 7:13
The argument that
this bipartisan approach is a reasonable compromise between the total
free-market or local-government approach and that of a huge activist
centralized government approach may appeal to some, but it is fraught
with great danger. Big government clearly wins; limited government and
the free market lose. Any talk of a Third Way is nothing more
than propaganda for big government. Its no compromise at all. The
principle of federal government control is fully endorsed by both
sides, and the argument that the Third Way might slow the
growth of big government falls flat. Actually, with bipartisan
cooperation, government growth may well accelerate.
2001 Ron Paul 7:14
How true
bipartisanship works in Washington is best illustrated by the way a
number of former Members of Congress make a living after leaving
office. They find it quite convenient to associate with other former
Members of the opposing party and start a lobbying firm. What might
have appeared to be contentious differences when in office are easily
put aside to lobby their respected party Members. Essentially no
philosophic difference of importance exists-its only a matter of
degree and favors sought, since both parties must be won over. The
differences they might have had while they were voting Members of
Congress existed only for the purpose of appealing to their different
constituencies, not serious differences of opinion as to what the role
of government ought to be. This is the reality of bipartisanship. Sadly
our system handsomely rewards those who lobby well and in a bipartisan
fashion. Congressional service too often is a training ground or a farm
system for the ultimate government service: lobbying Congress for the
benefit of powerful and wealthy special interests.
2001 Ron Paul 7:15
It should be
clearly evident, however, that all the campaign finance reforms and
lobbying controls conceivable will not help the situation. Limiting the
right to petition Congress or restricting peoples right to spend their
own money will always fail and is not morally acceptable and misses the
point. As long as government has so much to offer, public officials
will be tempted to accept the generous offers of support from special
interests. Those who can benefit have too much at stake not to be in
the business of influencing government. Eliminating the power of
government to pass out favors is the only real solution. Short of that,
the only other reasonable solution must come by Members refusal to be
influenced by the pressure that special-interest money can exert. This
requires moral restraint by our leaders. Since this has not happened,
special-interest favoritism has continued to grow.
2001 Ron Paul 7:16
The bipartisanship of the last
50 years has allowed our government to gain control over half of the
income of most Americans. Being enslaved half the time is hardly a good
compromise. But supporters of the political status quo point out that,
in spite of the loss of personal freedom, the country continues to
thrive in many ways.
2001 Ron Paul 7:17
But there are some serious
questions that we as a people must answer:
2001 Ron Paul 7:21
Have we sacrificed our liberties for government security?
2001 Ron Paul 7:22
Have we undermined the very system that has allowed productive
effort to provide a high standard of living for so many?
2001 Ron Paul 7:23
Has this system in recent years excluded some from the benefits
that Wall Street and others have enjoyed?
2001 Ron Paul 7:24
Has it led to needless and dangerous US intervention overseas and
created problems that we are not yet fully aware of?
2001 Ron Paul 7:25
Is it morally permissible in a country that professes to respect
individual liberty to routinely give handouts to the poor, and provide
benefits to the privileged and rich by stealing the fruits of labor
from hard-working Americans?
2001 Ron Paul 7:26
As we move into the next
Congress, some worry that gridlock will make it impossible to get
needed legislation passed. This seems highly unlikely. If big
government supporters found ways to enlarge the government in the past,
the current evenly split Congress will hardly impede this trend and may
even accelerate it. With a recession on the horizon, both sides will be
more eager than ever to cooperate on expanding federal spending to
stimulate the economy, whether the fictitious budget surplus
shrinks or not.
2001 Ron Paul 7:27
In this frantic
effort to take care of the economy, promote education, save Social
Security, and provide for the medical needs of all Americans, no
serious discussion will take place on the political conditions required
for a free people to thrive. If not, all efforts to patch the current
system together will be at the expense of personal liberty, private
property, and sound money.
2001 Ron Paul 7:28
If we are truly
taking a more dangerous course, the biggest question is: How long will
it be before a major political-economic crisis engulfs our land? That,
of course, is not known, and certainly not necessary if we as a people
and especially the Congress understand the nature of the crisis and do
something to prevent the crisis from undermining our liberties. We
should, instead, encourage prosperity by avoiding any international
conflict that threatens our safety or wastefully consumes our needed
resources.
2001 Ron Paul 7:29
Congressional
leaders have a responsibility to work together for the good of the
country. But working together to promote a giant interventionist state
dangerous to us all is far different from working together to preserve
constitutionally protected liberties.
2001 Ron Paul 7:30
Many argue that the compromise
of bipartisanship is needed to get even a little of what the
limited-government advocates want. But this is a fallacious argument.
More freedom can never be gained by giving up freedom, no matter the
rationale.
2001 Ron Paul 7:31
If liberals want
$46 billion for the Department of Education and conservatives argue for
$42 billion, a compromise of $44 billion is a total victory for the
advocates of federal government control of public education. "Saving"
$2 billion means nothing in the scheme of things, especially since the
case for the constitutional position of zero funding was never
entertained. When the budget and government controls are expanding each
year, a token cut in the proposed increase means nothing, and those who
claim it to be a legitimate victory do great harm to the cause of
liberty by condoning the process. Instead of it being a Third Way
alternative to the two sides arguing over minor details on how to use
government force, the three options instead are philosophically the
same. A true alternative must be offered if the growth of the state is
to be contained. Third-Way bipartisanship is not the answer.
2001 Ron Paul 7:32
However, if in the
future, the constitutionalists argue for zero funding for the Education
Department, and the liberals argue to increase it to $50 billion, and
finally $25 billion is accepted as the compromise, progress will have
been made.
2001 Ron Paul 7:33
But this is not what is being
talked about in DC when an effort is made to find a Third Way.
Both sides are talking about expanding government, and neither side
questions the legitimacy of the particular program involved. Unless the
moral and constitutional debate changes, there can be no hope that the
trend toward bigger government with a sustained attack on personal
liberty will be reversed. It must become a moral and constitutional
issue.
2001 Ron Paul 7:34
Budgetary tokenism
hides the real issue. Even if someone claims to have just saved the
taxpayers a couple billion dollars, the deception does great harm in
the long run by failure to emphasize the importance of the Constitution
and the moral principles of liberty. It instead helps to deceive the
people into believing something productive is being done. But its
really worse than that, because neither party makes an effort to cut
the budget. The American people must prepare themselves for ever-more
spending and taxes.
2001 Ron Paul 7:35
A different
approach is needed if we want to protect the freedoms of all Americans,
to perpetuate prosperity, and to avoid a major military confrontation.
All three options in reality represent only a variation of the one
based on authoritarian and interventionist principles.
2001 Ron Paul 7:36
Nothing should be
taken for granted, neither our liberties nor our material well being.
Understanding the nature of a free society and favorably deciding on
its merit are required before true reform can be expected. If, however,
satisfaction and complacency with the current trend toward bigger and
more centralized government remain the dominant view, those who love
liberty more than promised security must be prepared for an unpleasant
future. And those alternative plans will surely vary from one another.
Tragically for some it will contribute to the violence that will surely
come when promises of government security are not forthcoming. We can
expect further violations of civil liberties by a government determined
to maintain order when difficult economic and political conditions
develop.
2001 Ron Paul 7:37
But none of this
needs occur if the principles that underpin our Republic, as designed
by the Founders, can be resurrected and re-instituted. Current problems
that we now confront are government-created and can be much more easily
dealt with when government is limited to its proper role of protecting
liberty, instead of promoting a welfare-fascist state.
2001 Ron Paul 7:38
There are reasons
to be optimistic that the principles of the Republic, the free market,
and respect for private property can be restored. However, there
remains good reason as well to be concerned that we must confront the
serious political and economic firestorm seen on the horizon before
that happens.
2001 Ron Paul 7:39
My concerns are
threefold: the health of the economy, the potential for war, and the
coming social discord. If our problems are ignored, they will further
undermine the civil liberties of all Americans. The next decade will be
a great challenge to all Americans.
2001 Ron Paul 7:41
The booming economy of the
last six years has come to an end. The only question remaining is how
bad the slump will be. Although many economists expressed surprise at
the sudden and serious shift in sentiment, others have been warning of
its inevitability. Boom times built on central-bank credit creation
always end in recession or depression. But central planners, being
extremely optimistic, hope that this time it will be different;
that a new era has arrived.
2001 Ron Paul 7:42
For several years,
weve heard the endless nostrum of a technology and productivity-driven
new paradigm that would make the excesses of the 1990s permanent and
real. Arguments that productivity increases made the grand prosperity
of the last six years possible were accepted as conventional wisdom,
although sound free-market analysts warned otherwise. We are now
witnessing an economic downturn that will, in all likelihood, be quite
serious. If our economic planners pursue the wrong course, they will
surely make it much worse and prolong the recovery.
2001 Ron Paul 7:43
Although computer
technology has been quite beneficial to the economy, in some ways these
benefits have been misleading by hiding the ill effects of central-bank
manipulation of interest rates and by causing many to believe that the
usual business-cycle correction could be averted. Instead, delaying a
correction that is destined to come only contributes to greater
distortions in the economy, thus requiring an even greater adjustment.
2001 Ron Paul 7:44
It seems obvious
that we are dealing with a financial bubble now deflating. Certainly,
most observers recognize that the NASDAQ was grossly overpriced. The
question remains, though, as to what is needed for the entire economy
to reach equilibrium and allow sound growth to resume.
2001 Ron Paul 7:45
Western leaders for
most of the 20th Century have come to accept a type of central planning
they believe is not burdened by the shortcomings of true socialist-type
central planning. Instead of outright government ownership of the means
of production, the economy was to be fine-tuned by fixing interest
rates (FED Funds Rates), subsidizing credit (Government Sponsored
Enterprises), stimulating sluggish segments of the economy (Farming and
the Weapons Industry), aiding the sick (Medicaid and Medicare),
federally managing education (Department of Education), and many other
welfare schemes.
2001 Ron Paul 7:46
The majority of
Americans have not yet accepted the harsh reality that this
less-threatening, friendlier type of economic planning is minimally
more efficient than that of the socialist planners with their five-year
economic plans. We must face the fact that the business cycle, with its
recurring recessions, wage controls, wealth transfers, and social
discord are still with us and will get worse unless there is a
fundamental change in economic and monetary policy. Regardless of the
type, central economic planning is a dangerous notion.
2001 Ron Paul 7:47
In an economic
downturn, a large majority of our political leaders believe that the
ill effects of recession can be greatly minimized by monetary and
fiscal policy. Although cutting taxes is always beneficial, spending
ones way out of a recession is no panacea. Even if some help is gained
by cutting taxes or temporary relief given by an increase in government
spending, they distract from the real cause of the downturn: previously
pursued faulty monetary policy. The consequences of interest-rate
manipulation in a recession-along with tax and spending changes-are
unpredictable and do not always produce the same results each time
theyre used. This is why interest rates of less than 1% and massive
spending programs have not revitalized Japans economy or her stock
market. We may well be witnessing the beginning of a major worldwide
economic downturn, making even more unpredictable the consequence of
conventional western-style central bank tinkering.
2001 Ron Paul 7:48
Theres good
reason to believe the Congress and the American people ought to be
concerned and start preparing for a slump that could play havoc with
our federal budget and the value of the American dollar. Certainly the
Congress has a profound responsibility in this area. If we ignore the
problems, or continue to endorse the economic myths of past
generations, our prosperity will be threatened. But our liberties could
be lost, as well, if expanding the governments role in the economy is
pursued as the only solution to the crisis.
2001 Ron Paul 7:49
Its important to
understand how we got ourselves into this mess. The blind faith that
wealth and capital can be created by the central banks creating money
and credit out of thin air, using government debt as its collateral,
along with fixing short-term interest rates, is a myth that must one
day be dispelled. All the hopes of productivity increases in a
dreamed-about new-era economy cannot repeal eternal economic laws.
2001 Ron Paul 7:50
The big shift in
sentiment of the past several months has come with a loss of confidence
in the status of the new paradigm. If were not careful, the likely
weakening of the US dollar could lead to a loss of confidence in
America and all her institutions. US political and economic power has
propped up the world economy for years. Trust in the dollar has given
us license to borrow and spend way beyond our means. But just because
world conditions have allowed us greater leverage to borrow and inflate
the currency than otherwise might have been permitted, the economic
limitations of such a policy still exist. This trust, however, did
allow for a greater financial bubble to develop and dislocations to
last longer, compared to similar excesses in less powerful nations.
2001 Ron Paul 7:51
There is one
remnant of the Bretton Woods gold-exchange standard that has aided US
dominance over the past 30 years. Gold was once the reserve all central
banks held to back up their currencies. After World War II, the world
central banks were satisfied to hold dollars, still considered to be as
good as gold since internationally the dollar could still be
exchanged for gold at $35 an ounce. When the system broke down in 1971,
and we defaulted on our promises to pay in gold, chaos broke out. By
default the dollar maintained its status as the reserve currency of the
world.
2001 Ron Paul 7:52
This is true, even
to this day. The dollar still represents approximately 77% of all world
central-bank reserves. This means that the United States has license to
steal. We print the money and spend it overseas, while world trust
continues because of our dominant economic and military power. This
results in a current account and trade deficit so large that almost all
economists agree that it cannot last. The longer and more extensive the
distortions in the international market, the greater will be the crisis
when the market dictates a correction. And thats what were starting
to see.
2001 Ron Paul 7:53
When the recession
hits full force, even the extraordinary power and influence of Alan
Greenspan and the Federal Reserve, along with all the other central
banks of the world, wont be able to stop the powerful natural economic
forces that demand equilibrium. Liquidation of unreasonable debt and
the elimination of the over-capacity built into the system and a return
to trustworthy money and trustworthy government will be necessary.
Quite an undertaking!
2001 Ron Paul 7:54
Instead of looking
at the real cost and actual reasons for the recent good years,
politicians and many Americans have been all too eager to accept the
new-found wealth as permanent and deserved, as part of a grand new era.
Even with a national debt that continued to grow, all the talk in DC
was about how to handle the magnificent budget surpluses.
2001 Ron Paul 7:55
Since 1998, when it
was announced that we had a budgetary surplus to deal with, the
national debt has nevertheless grown by more than $230 billion dollars,
albeit at a rate less than in the early 1990s, but certainly a sum that
should not be ignored. But the really big borrowing has been what the
US as a whole has borrowed from foreigners to pay for the huge deficit
we have in our current account. We are now by far the largest foreign
debtor in the world and in all of history.
2001 Ron Paul 7:56
This convenient
arrangement has allowed us to live beyond our means and, according to
long-understood economic laws, must end. A declining dollar confirms
that our ability to painlessly borrow huge sums will no longer be cheap
or wise.
2001 Ron Paul 7:57
During the past 30
years in the post-Bretton Woods era, worldwide sentiment has permitted
us to inflate our money supply and get others to accept the dollar as
if it were as good as gold. This convenient arrangement has discouraged
savings, which are now at an historic low. Savings in a capitalist
economy are crucial for furnishing capital and establishing market
interest rates. With negative savings and with the FED fixing rates by
creating credit out of thin air and calling it capital, we have
abandoned a necessary part of free-market capitalism, without which a
smooth and growing economy is sustainable.
2001 Ron Paul 7:58
No one should be
surprised when recessions hit or bewildered as to their cause or
danger. The greater surprise should be the endurance of an economy
fine-tuned by a manipulative central bank and a compulsively
interventionist Congress. But the full payment for all past economic
sins may now be required. Lets hope we can keep the pain and suffering
to a minimum.
2001 Ron Paul 7:59
The most recent new
era of the 1990s appeared to be an answer to all politicians dreams: a
good economy, low unemployment, minimal price inflation, a skyrocketing
stock market, with capital gains tax revenues flooding the Treasury,
thus providing money to accommodate every special-interest demand. But
it was too good to be true. It was based on an inflated currency and
massive corporate, personal, and government borrowing. A recession was
inevitable to pay for the extravagance that many knew was an inherent
part of the new era, understanding that abundance without a
commensurate amount of work was not achievable.
2001 Ron Paul 7:60
The mantra now is
for the FED to quickly lower short-term interest rates to stimulate the
economy and alleviate a liquidity crisis. This policy may stimulate a
boom and may help in a mild downturn, but it doesnt always work in a
bad recession. It actually could do great harm since it could weaken
the dollar, which in turn would allow market forces instead to push
long-term interest rates higher. Deliberately lowering interest rates
isnt even necessary for the dollar to drop, since our policy has led
to a current-account deficit of a magnitude that demands the dollar
eventually readjust and weaken.
2001 Ron Paul 7:61
A slumping stock market will
also cause the dollar to decline and interest rates to rise. Federal
Reserve Board central planning through interest-rate control is not a
panacea. It is instead the culprit that produces the business cycle.
Government and FED officials have been reassuring the public that no
structural problems exists, citing no inflation and a gold price that
reassures the world that the dollar is indeed still king.
2001 Ron Paul 7:62
The FED can create
excess credit, but it cant control where it goes as it circulates
throughout the economy; nor can it dictate value either. Claiming that
a subdued government-rigged CPI and PPI proves that no inflation exists
is pure nonsense. It is well established that, under certain
circumstances, new credit inflation can find its way into the stock or
real estate market, as it did in the 1920s, while consumer prices
remain relatively stable. This does not negate the distortion inherit
in a system charged with artificially low interest rates. Instead it
allows the distortion to last longer and become more serious, leading
to a bigger correction.
2001 Ron Paul 7:63
If gold prices
reflected the true extent of the inflated dollar, confidence in the
dollar specifically and in paper more generally would be undermined. It
is a high priority of the FED and all central banks of the world for
this not to happen. Revealing to the public the fraud associated with
all paper money would cause loss of credibility of all central banks.
This knowledge would jeopardize the central banks ability to perform
the role of lender of last resort and to finance/monetize government
debt. It is for this reason that the price of gold in their eyes must
be held in check.
2001 Ron Paul 7:64
From 1945 to 1971,
the United States literally dumped nearly 500 million ounces of gold at
$35 an ounce in an effort to do the same thing by continuing the policy
of printing money at will, with the hopes that there would be no
consequences to the value of the dollar. That all ended in 1971 when
the markets overwhelmed the world central banks.
2001 Ron Paul 7:65
A similar effort
continues today, with central banks selling and loaning gold to keep
the price in check. Its working and does convey false confidence, but
it cant last. Most Americans are wise to the governments statistics
regarding prices and the "no-inflation" rhetoric. Everyone is aware
that the prices of oil, gasoline, natural gas, medical care, repairs,
houses, and entertainment have all been rapidly rising. The
artificially low gold price has aided the governments charade, but it
has also allowed a bigger bubble to develop. This policy cannot
continue. Economic law dictates a correction that most Americans will
find distasteful and painful. Duration and severity of the liquidation
phase of the business cycle can be limited by proper responses, but it
cannot be avoided and could be made worse if the wrong course is chosen.
2001 Ron Paul 7:66
Recent
deterioration of the junk-bond market indicates how serious the
situation is. Junk bonds are now paying 9% to 10% more than short-term
government securities. The quality of business loans is suffering,
while more and more corporate bonds are qualifying for junk status. The
FED tries to reassure us by attempting to stimulate the economy with
low short-term FED fund rates at the same time interest rates for
businesses and consumers are rising. There comes a time when FED policy
is ineffective, much to everyones chagrin.
2001 Ron Paul 7:67
Micromanaging an
economy effectively for a long period of time, even with the power a
central bank wields, is an impossible task. The good times are
ephemeral and eventually must be paid for by contraction and renewed
real savings.
2001 Ron Paul 7:68
There is much more
to inflation than rising prices. Inflation is defined as the increase
in the supply of money and credit. Obsessively sticking to the rising
prices definition conveniently ignores placing the blame on the
responsible party – the Federal Reserve. The last thing central banks or
the politicians, who need a backup for all their spending mischief,
want is for the government to lose its power to create money out of
thin air, which serves political and privileged financial interests.
2001 Ron Paul 7:69
When the people are
forced to think only about rising prices, government-doctored price
indexes can dampen concerns for inflation. Blame then can be laid at
the doorstep of corporate profiteers, price gougers, labor unions, oil
sheikhs, or greedy doctors. But it is never placed at the feet of
highly paid athletes or entertainers. It would be economically
incorrect to do so, but its political correctness that doesnt allow
some groups to be vilified.
2001 Ron Paul 7:70
Much else related to
artificially low interest rates goes unnoticed. An overpriced stock
market, overcapacity in certain industries, excesses in real-estate
markets, artificially high bond prices, general mal-investments,
excessive debt, and speculation all result from the generous and
artificial credit the Federal Reserve pumps into the financial system.
These distortions are every bit, if not more, harmful than rising
prices. As the economy soars from the stimulus effect of low interest
rates, growth and distortions compound themselves. In a slump the
reverse is true, and the pain and suffering is magnified as the
adjustment back to reality occurs.
2001 Ron Paul 7:71
The extra credit in
the 1990s has found its way especially into the housing market like
never before. GSEs, in particular Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, have
gobbled up huge sums to finance a booming housing market. GSE
securities enjoy implicit government guarantees, which have allowed for
a generous discount on most housing loans. They have also been the
vehicles used by consumers to refinance and borrow against their home
equity to use these funds for other purposes, such as investing in the
stock market. This has further undermined savings by using the equity
that builds with price inflation that homeowners enjoy when money is
debased. In addition, the Federal Reserve now buys and holds GSE
securities as collateral in their monetary operations. These securities
are then literally used as collateral for printing Federal Reserve
notes; this is a dangerous precedent.
2001 Ron Paul 7:72
If monetary
inflation merely raised prices, and all prices and labor costs moved up
at the same rate, and it did not cause dis-equilibrium in the market,
it would be of little consequence. But inflation is far more than
rising prices. Creating money out of thin air is morally equivalent to
counterfeiting. Its fraud and theft, because it steals purchasing
power from the savers and those on fixed incomes. That in itself should
compel all nations to prohibit it, as did the authors of our
Constitution.
2001 Ron Paul 7:73
Inflation is
socially disruptive in that the management of fiat money-as all todays
currencies are- causes great hardships. Unemployment is a direct
consequence of the constantly recurring recessions. Persistent rising
costs impoverish many as the standard of living of unfortunate groups
erodes. Because the pain and suffering that comes from monetary
debasement is never evenly distributed, certain segments of society can
actually benefit.
2001 Ron Paul 7:74
In the 1990s, Wall Streeters
thrived, while some low-income, non-welfare, non-homeowners suffered
with rising costs for fuel, rent, repairs, and medical care. Generally
one should expect the middle class to suffer and to literally be wiped
out in a severe inflation. When this happens, as it did in many
countries throughout the 20th Century, social and political conflicts
become paramount when finger pointing becomes commonplace by those who
suffer looking for scapegoats. Almost always the hostility is
inaccurately directed.
2001 Ron Paul 7:75
There is a greater
threat from the monetary mischief than just the economic harm it does.
The threat to liberty resulting when economic strife hits and
finger-pointing increases should concern us most. We should never be
complacent about monetary policy.
2001 Ron Paul 7:76
We must reassess
the responsibility Congress has in maintaining a sound monetary system.
In the 19th Century, the constitutionality of a central bank was
questioned and challenged. Not until 1913 were the advocates of a
strong federalist system able to foist a powerful central bank on us,
while destroying the gold standard. This banking system, which now
serves as the financial arm of Congress, has chosen to pursue massive
welfare spending and a foreign policy that has caused us to be at war
for much of the 20th Century.
2001 Ron Paul 7:77
Without the central
bank creating money out of thin air, our welfare state and worldwide
imperialism would have been impossible to finance. Attempts at economic
fine-tuning by monetary authorities would have been impossible without
a powerful central bank. Propping up the stock market as it falters
would be impossible as well.
2001 Ron Paul 7:78
But the day will
come when we will have no choice but to question the current system.
Yes, the FED does help to finance the welfare state. Yes, the FED does
come to the rescue when funds are needed to fight wars and for us to
pay the cost of maintaining our empire. Yes, the Fed is able to
stimulate the economy and help create what appear to be good times. But
its all built on an illusion. Wealth cannot come from a printing
press. Empires crumble and a price is eventually paid for arrogance
toward others. And booms inevitably turn into busts.
2001 Ron Paul 7:79
Talk of a new era the past
five years has had many, including Greenspan, believing that this
time
it really would be different. And it may indeed be different this time.
The correction could be an especially big one, since the Fed-driven
distortion of the past 10 years, plus the lingering distortions of
previous decades have been massive. The correction could be big enough
to challenge all our institutions, the entire welfare state, Social
Security, foreign intervention, and our national defense. This will
only happen if the dollar is knocked off its pedestal. No one knows if
that is going to happen soon or later. But when it does, our
constitutional system of government will be challenged to the core.
2001 Ron Paul 7:80
Ultimately the
solution will require a recommitment to the principles of liberty,
including a belief in sound money- when money once again will be
something of value rather than pieces of paper or mere blips from a
Federal Reserve computer. In spite of the grand technological
revolution, we are still having trouble with a few simple basic tasks – counting votes or keeping the lights on or understanding the sinister
nature of paper money.
2001 Ron Paul 7:82
Foreign military
interventionism, a policy the US has followed for over 100 years,
encourages war and undermines peace. Even with the good intentions of
many who support this policy, it serves the interests of powerful
commercial entities. Perpetual conflicts stimulate military spending.
Minimal and small wars too often get out of control and cause more
tragedy than originally anticipated. Small wars like the Persian Gulf
War are more easily tolerated, but the foolishness of an out-of-control
war like Vietnam is met with resistance from a justifiably aroused
nation. But both types of conflicts result from the same flawed foreign
policy of foreign interventionism. Both types of conflicts can be
prevented.
2001 Ron Paul 7:83
National security
is usually cited to justify our foreign involvement, but this excuse
distracts from the real reason we venture so far from home. Influential
commercial interests dictate policy of when and where we go. Persian
Gulf oil obviously got more attention than genocide in Rwanda. If one
were truly concerned about our security and enhancing peace, one would
always opt for a less militarist policy. Its not a coincidence that US
territory and US citizens are the most vulnerable in the world to
terrorist attacks. Escalation of the war on terrorism and not
understanding its cause is a dangerous temptation.
2001 Ron Paul 7:84
Not only does
foreign interventionism undermine chances for peace and prosperity, it
undermines personal liberty. War and preparing for war must always be
undertaken at someones expense. Someone must pay the bills with higher
taxes, and someone has to be available to pay with their lives. Its
never the political and industrial leaders who promote the policy who
pay. They are the ones who reap the benefits, while at the same time
arguing for the policy they claim is designed to protect freedom and
prosperity for the very ones being victimized.
2001 Ron Paul 7:85
Many reasons given for our
willingness to police the world sound reasonable: We need to protect our
oil. We need to stop cocaine production in Colombia. We need to bring
peace to the Middle East. We need to punish our adversaries. We must
respond because we are the sole superpower and its our responsibility
to maintain world order. Its our moral obligation to settle disputes.
We must follow up on our dollar diplomacy after sending foreign aid
throughout the world. In the old days it was: we need to stop the
spread of Communism. The excuses are endless!
2001 Ron Paul 7:86
But its rarely
mentioned that the lobbyists and proponents of foreign intervention are
the weapons manufacturers, the oil companies, and the recipients of
huge contracts for building infrastructures in whatever far corner of
the earth we send our troops. Financial interests have a lot at stake,
and its important for them that the United States maintains its
empire. Not infrequently, ethnic groups will influence foreign policy
for reasons other than preserving our security. This type of political
pressure can at times be substantial and emotional.
2001 Ron Paul 7:87
We often try to
please too many, and by doing so support both sides of conflicts that
have raged for centuries. In the end, our efforts can end up unifying
our adversaries while alienating our friends.
2001 Ron Paul 7:88
Over the past 50
years, Congress has allowed our presidents to usurp the prerogatives
the Constitution explicitly gave only to the Congress. The term
foreign policy
is never mentioned in the Constitution and it was never intended to be
monopolized by the president. Going to war was to be strictly a
legislative function, not an Executive one.
2001 Ron Paul 7:89
Operating foreign
policy by Executive Orders and invoking unratified treaties is a slap
in the face to the rule of law and our republican form of government.
But thats currently being done.
2001 Ron Paul 7:90
US policy over the
past 50 years has led to endless illegal military interventions, from
Korea to our ongoing war with Iraq and military occupations in the
Balkans. Many Americans have died and many others have been wounded or
injured or have been forgotten. Numerous innocent victims living in
foreign lands have died, as well, from the bombing and blockades we
have imposed. They have been people with whom we have had no fight but
who were trapped between the bad policy of their own leaders and our
eagerness to demonstrate our prowess to the world. Over 500,000 Iraqi
children have reportedly died as a consequence of our bombing and
denying food and medicine by our embargo.
2001 Ron Paul 7:91
For over 50 years,
there has been a precise move toward one-world government at the
expense of our own sovereignty. Our presidents claim that authority to
wage war can come from the United Nations or NATO resolutions, in
contradiction of our Constitution and everything our Founding Fathers
believed. US troops are now required to serve under foreign commanders
and wear UN insignias. Refusal to do so prompts a court martial.
2001 Ron Paul 7:92
The past President,
before leaving office, signed the 1998 UN Rome Treaty, indicating our
willingness to establish an International Criminal Court. This gives
the UN authority to enforce global laws against Americans if ratified
by the Senate. Even without ratification, we have gotten to the point
where treaties of this sort can be imposed on non-participating
nations. Presidents have, by Executive Order, been willing to follow
unratified treaties in the past. This is a very dangerous precedent.
2001 Ron Paul 7:93
We already accept
the WTO and its international trade court. Trade wars are fought with
this courts supervision, and we are only too ready to rewrite our tax
laws as the WTO dictates. The only portion of the major tax bill at the
end of the last Congress to be rushed through for the Presidents
signature was the Foreign Sales Corporation changes dictated to us by
the WTO.
2001 Ron Paul 7:94
For years the US
has accepted the international financial and currency management of the
IMF- another arm of one-world government.
2001 Ron Paul 7:95
The World Bank serves as the
distributor of international welfare, of which the US taxpayer is the
biggest donor. This organization helps carry out a policy of taking
money from poor Americans and giving it to rich foreign leaders, with
kickbacks to some of our international corporations. Support for the
World Bank, the IMF, the WTO, and the International Criminal Court
always comes from the elites and almost never from the common man.
2001 Ron Paul 7:96
These programs run
by the international institutions are supposed to help the poor, but
they never do. Its all a charade, and if left unchecked, they will
bankrupt us and encourage more world government mischief.
2001 Ron Paul 7:97
Its the
responsibility of Congress to curtail this trend by reestablishing the
principles of the US Constitution and our national sovereignty. Its
time for the United States to give up its membership in all these
international organizations.
2001 Ron Paul 7:98
Our foreign policy
has led to an incestuous relationship between our military and
Hollywood. In December, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen used
$295,000 of taxpayer money to host a party in Los Angeles for Hollywood
bigwigs. Pentagon spokesman Kenneth Bacon said it was well worth it.
The purpose was to thank the movie industry for putting the
military in a good light.
A similar relationship has been reported with TV stations licensed by
the US government. They have been willing to accept suggestions from
the government to place political messages in their programming. This
is a dangerous trend, mixing government and the media. Now heres where
real separation is needed!
2001 Ron Paul 7:99
Our policy should
change for several reasons. Its wrong for our foreign policy to serve
any special interest, whether its for financial benefits, ethnic
pressures, or some contrived moral imperative. Too often the policy
leads to an unintended consequence, and more people are killed and more
property damaged than was intended. Controlling world events is never
easy. Its better to avoid the chance of one bad decision leading to
another. The best way to do that is to follow the advice of the
Founders and avoid all entangling alliances and pursue a policy
designed solely to protect US national security interests.
2001 Ron Paul 7:100
The two areas in
the world that currently present the greatest danger to the United
States are Colombia and the Middle East. For decades, we have been
engulfed in the ancient wars of the Middle East by subsidizing and
supporting both sides. This policy is destined to fail. We are in great
danger of becoming involved in a vicious war for oil, as well as being
drawn into a religious war that will not end in our lifetime. The
potential for war in this region is great, and the next one could make
the Persian Gulf War look small. Only a reassessment of our entire
policy will keep us from being involved in a needless and dangerous war
in this region.
2001 Ron Paul 7:101
It will be
difficult to separate any involvement in the Balkans from a major
conflict that breaks out in the Middle East. Its impossible for us to
maintain a policy that both supports Israel and provides security for
Western-leaning secular Arab leaders, while at the same time taunting
the Islamic fundamentalists. Push will come to shove, and when that
happens in the midst of an economic crisis, our resources will be
stretched beyond the limit. This must be prevented.
2001 Ron Paul 7:102
Our involvement in
Colombia could easily escalate into a regional war. For over 100 years,
we have been involved in the affairs of Central America, but the recent
escalation of our presence in Colombia is inviting trouble for us.
2001 Ron Paul 7:103
Although the
justification for our enhanced presence is the War on Drugs, protecting
US oil interests and selling helicopters are the real reasons for last
years $1.3 billion emergency funding. Already neighboring countries
have expressed concern about our presence in Colombia. The US
policymakers gave their usual response by promising more money and
support to the neighboring countries that feel threatened.
2001 Ron Paul 7:104
Venezuela, rich in
oil, is quite nervous about our enhanced presence in the region. Their
foreign minister stated that if any of our ships enter the Gulf of
Venezuela they will be expelled. This statement was prompted by
an overly aggressive US Coast Guard vessels intrusion into Venezuelan
territorial waters on a drug expedition. I know of no one who believes
this expanded and insane drug war will do anything to dampen drug usage
in the United States. Yet it will cost us plenty. Too bad our political
leaders cannot take a hint. The war effort in Colombia is small now,
but under current conditions it will surely escalate. This is a
30-year-old civil war being fought in the jungles of South America. We
are unwelcome by many, and we ought to have enough sense to stay out of
it. Recently new policy has led to the spraying of herbicides to
destroy the coca fields. Its already been reported that the legal
crops in nearby fields have been destroyed as well. This is no way to
win friends around the world.
2001 Ron Paul 7:105
There are many
other areas of the world where we ought to take a second look, and then
come home. Instead of bullying the European Union for wanting to have
their own rapid deployment force, we should praise them and bring our
troops home. World War II has been over for 55 years.
2001 Ron Paul 7:106
Its time we look at Korea and
ask why we have to broker, with the use of American dollars and
American soldiers, the final settlement between North and South Korea.
2001 Ron Paul 7:107
Taiwan and China
are now trading and investing in each others country. Travel
restrictions have been recently liberalized. Its time for us to let
the two of them settle their border dispute.
2001 Ron Paul 7:108
We continue to
support Turkey with dollars and weapons. We once supported Iraq with
the same. Now we permit Turkey, armed with American weapons, to kill
Kurds in Iraq, while we bomb the Iraqis if they do the same. It makes
no sense.
2001 Ron Paul 7:109
Selling weapons to
both factions of almost all the major conflicts of the past 50 years
reveals that our involvement is more about selling weapons than
spreading the message of freedom. That message can never be delivered
through force to others over their objection. Only a policy of peace,
friendship, trade, and our setting a good example can inspire others to
look to what once was the American tradition of liberty and justice for
all. Entangling alliances wont do it. Its time for Congress and the
American people to wake up.
2001 Ron Paul 7:111
The political system of
interventionism always leads to social discord. Interventionism is
based on relative rights, majoritarianism, and disrespect for the
Constitution. Degenerating moral standards of the people encourages and
feeds on this system of special-interest favoritism, all of which
contribute to the friction.
2001 Ron Paul 7:112
Thomas Jefferson
was worried that future generations might squander the liberties the
American Revolution secured. Writing about future generations,
Jefferson wondered if; "in the enjoyment of plenty, they would, lose
the memory of freedom." He believed: "Material abundance without
character is the path to destruction."
2001 Ron Paul 7:113
The challenge to
America today is clearly evident. We lack character, and we also suffer
from a loss of respect, understanding, and faith in the liberty that
offers so much. The American Republic has been transformed and only a
remnant remains. It appears that in the midst of plenty, we have
forgotten about freedom.
2001 Ron Paul 7:114
We have just gone
through a roaring decade with many Americans enjoying prosperity beyond
their wildest dreams. Because this wealth was not always earned and
instead resulted from borrowing, speculation, and inflation, the
correction thats to come will contribute to the social discord already
inherent in a system of government interventionism. If, indeed, the
economy enters a severe recession, which is highly possible, it will
compound the problems characteristic of a system that encourages
government supervision over all that we do.
2001 Ron Paul 7:115
Conflicts between
classes, races, ethnic groups, and even generations are already
apparent. This is a consequence of pitting workers and producers
against moochers and the special-interest rich. Divvying up half of the
GDP through a process of confiscatory taxation invites trouble. It is
more easily tolerated when wealth abounds; but when the economy slips,
quiescent resentment quickly turns to noisy confrontation. Those who
feel slighted become more demanding at the same time resources are
diminished.
2001 Ron Paul 7:116
But the system of
government we have become accustomed to has, for decades, taken over
responsibilities that were never intended to be the prerogative of the
federal government under the Constitution. Although mostly well
intended, the efforts at social engineering have caused significant
damage to our constitutional Republic and have resulted in cynicism
toward all politicians. Our presidents are now elected by less than 20%
of those old enough to vote. Government is perceived to be in the
business of passing out favors rather than protecting individual
liberty. The majority of the people are made up of independents and
non-voters.
2001 Ron Paul 7:117
The most dramatic
change in 20th Century social attitudes was the acceptance of abortion.
This resulted from a change in personal morality that then led to
legalization nationally through the courts and only occurred by
perverting our constitutional system of government. The federal courts
should never have been involved, but the Congress compounded the
problem by using taxpayer funds to perform abortions both here and
overseas. Confrontation between the pro-life and the pro-abortion
forces is far from over. If government were used only to preserve life,
rather than act as an accomplice in the taking of life, this conflict
would not be nearly so rancorous.
2001 Ron Paul 7:118
Once a society and
a system of laws deny the importance of life, privacy and personal
choice are difficult to protect. Since abortions have become
commonplace, it has been easier to move the issue of active euthanasia
to center stage. As government budgets become more compromised,
economic arguments will surely be used to justify reasonable savings by
not wasting vital resources on the elderly.
2001 Ron Paul 7:119
Issues like
abortion and euthanasia dont disappear in a free society but are
handled quite differently. Instead of condoning or paying for such
acts, the state is responsible for protecting life, rather than
participating in taking it. This is quite a different role for
government than we currently have.
2001 Ron Paul 7:120
We can expect the pro-life and
pro-abortion and euthanasia groups to become more vocal and
confrontational in time, as long as government is used to commit acts
that a large number of people find abhorrent. Partial-birth abortion
dramatizes the issue at hand and clearly demonstrates how close we are
to legalizing infanticide. This problem should be dealt with by the
states and without the federal courts or US Congress involvement.
2001 Ron Paul 7:121
The ill-conceived
drug war of the past 30 years has caused great harm to our society. It
has undermined privacy and challenged the constitutional rights of all
our citizens. The accelerated attack on drug usage since the early
1970s has not resulted in any material benefit. Over $300 billion has
been spent on this war, and we are all less free and poorer because of
it. Civil liberties are sacrificed in all wars, both domestic and
foreign. Its clear that, even if it were a legitimate function for
government to curtail drug usage, eliminating bad habits through
government regulation is not achievable. Like so much else that
government tries to do, the harm done is not always evenly distributed.
Some groups suffer more than others, further compounding the problem by
causing dissention and distrust.
2001 Ron Paul 7:122
Anthony Lewis of the New
York Times
reported last year: "The 480,00 men and women now in US prisons on drug
charges are 100,000 more than all prisoners in the European Union,
where the population is 100 million more than ours."
2001 Ron Paul 7:123
There are ten times
the number of prisoners for drug offenses than there were in 1980, and
80% of the drug arrests are for non-violent possession. In spite of all
the money spent and energy wasted, drug usage continues at a record
pace. Someday we must wake up and realize the federal drug war is a
farce. It has failed and we must change our approach.
2001 Ron Paul 7:124
As bad as drug
addiction is and the harm it causes, it is miniscule compared to the
dollar cost, the loss of liberty, and social conflict that results from
our ill-advised drug war.
2001 Ron Paul 7:125
Mandatory drug
sentencing laws have done a great deal of harm by limiting the
discretion that judges could use in sentencing victims in the drug war.
Congress should repeal or change these laws, just as we found it
beneficial to modify seizure and forfeiture laws two years ago.
2001 Ron Paul 7:126
The drug laws, Im
sure, were never meant to be discriminatory, yet they are. In
Massachusetts, 82.9% of the drug offenders are minorities, but they
make up only 9% of the state population. The fact that crack-cocaine
users are more likely to land in prison than powder-cocaine users, and
with harsher sentences, discriminates against black Americans. A
wealthy suburbanite caught using drugs is much less likely to end up in
prison than someone from the inner city. This inequity adds to the
conflict between races and between the poor and the police. And its
unnecessary.
2001 Ron Paul 7:127
There are no
documented benefits from the drug war. Even if a reduction in drug
usage could have been achieved, the cost in dollars and loss of liberty
would never have justified it. But we dont have that to deal with,
since drug usage continues to get worse; in addition we have all the
problems associated with the drug war.
2001 Ron Paul 7:128
The effort to
diminish the use of drugs and to improve the personal habits of some of
our citizens has been the excuse to undermine our freedoms. Ironically
we spend hundreds of billions of dollars waging this dangerous war on
drugs while government educational policies promote a huge and
dangerous over-usage of Ritalin.
2001 Ron Paul 7:129
Seizure and
forfeiture laws, clearly in violation of the Constitution, have served
as a terrible incentive for many police departments to raise money for
law-enforcement projects outside the normal budgeting process.
Nationalizing the police force for various reasons is a trend that
should frighten all Americans. The drug war has been the most important
factor in this trend.
2001 Ron Paul 7:130
Medicinal use of
illegal drugs, in particular marijuana, has been prohibited and greater
human suffering has resulted. Imprisoning a person who is dying from
cancer and Aids for using his own self-cultivated marijuana is
absolutely bizarre and cruel.
2001 Ron Paul 7:131
All
addiction — alcohol and illegal drugs — should be seen as a medical
problem, not a legal one. Improving behavior, just for the sake of
changing unpopular habits, never works. It should never be the
responsibility of government to do so. When government attempts to do
this, the government and its police force become the criminals. When
someone under the influence of drugs, alcohol (also a drug), or even
from the lack of sleep causes injury to another, local law-enforcement
officials have a responsibility. This is a far cry from the Justice
Department using army tanks to bomb the Davidians because federal
agents claimed an amphetamine lab was possibly on the premises.
2001 Ron Paul 7:132
An interventionist
government, by its nature, uses any excuse to know what the people are
doing. Drug laws are used to enhance the IRS agents ability to collect
every dime owed the government. These laws are used to pressure
Congress to spend more dollars for foreign military operations in
places such as Colombia. Artificially high drug prices allow government
to clandestinely participate in the drug trade to raise funds to fight
the secret controversial wars with off-budget funding. Both our friends
and foes depend on the drug war at times for revenue to pursue their
causes, which frequently are the same as ours.
2001 Ron Paul 7:133
The sooner we wake up to this
seriously flawed approach to fighting drug usage the better.
2001 Ron Paul 7:134
The notion that the
Federal government has an obligation to protect us from ourselves
drives the drug war. But this idea also drives the do-gooders in
Washington to involve themselves in every aspect of our lives. American
citizens cannot move without being constantly reminded by consumer
advocates, environmentalists, safety experts, and bureaucratic
busybodies what they can or cannot do.
2001 Ron Paul 7:135
Once government
becomes our protector, there are no limits. Federal regulations dictate
the amount of water in our commodes and the size and shape of our
washing machines. Complicated USDA regulations dictate the size of the
holes in Swiss cheese. We cannot even turn off our automobile airbags
when they present a danger to a child without federal permission.
Riding in a car without a seat belt may be unwise, but should it be a
federal crime? Why not make us all wear rib pads and football helmets?
That would reduce serious injury and save many dollars for the
government health system.
2001 Ron Paul 7:136
Regulations on
holistic medicine, natural remedies, herbs, and vitamins are now
commonplace and continue to grow. Who gave the government the right to
make these personal decisions for us? Are the people really so ignorant
that only politicians and bureaucrats can make these delicate decisions
for them?
2001 Ron Paul 7:137
Today if a drug
shows promise for treating a serious illness, and both patient and
doctor would like to try it on an experimental basis, permission can be
given only by the FDA- and only after much begging and pleading.
Permission frequently is not granted, even if the dying patient is
pleading to take the risk. The government is not anxious to give up any
of its power to make these decisions. People in government think thats
what they are supposed to do for the good of the people.
2001 Ron Paul 7:138
Free choice is what
freedom is all about. And it means freedom to take risks as well. As a
physician deeply concerned about the health of all Americans, I am
convinced that the government encroachment into health-care choices has
been very detrimental.
2001 Ron Paul 7:139
There are many
areas where the federal government has gotten involved when it
shouldnt have, and created more problems than it solved. There is no
evidence that the federal government has improved education or
medicine, in spite of the massive funding and mandates of the last 40
years. Yet all we hear is a call for increased spending and more
mandates. How bad it will get before we reject the big-government
approach is anybodys guess.
2001 Ron Paul 7:140
Welfarism and
government interventionism are failed systems and always lead to
ever-more intrusive government. The issue of privacy is paramount. Most
Americans and Members of Congress recognize the need to protect
everyones privacy. But the loss of privacy is merely the symptom of an
authoritarian government. Effort can and should be made, even under
todays circumstances, to impede the governments invasion of privacy.
2001 Ron Paul 7:141
We must realize
that our privacy and our liberty will always be threatened as long as
we instruct our government to manage a welfare state and to operate
foreign policy as if we are the worlds policemen.
2001 Ron Paul 7:142
If the trends we
have witnessed over the past 70 years are not reversed, our economic
and political system will soon be transposed into a fascist system. The
further along we go in that direction, the more difficult it becomes to
reverse the tide without undue suffering. This cannot be done unless
respect for the rule of law is restored. That means all public
officials must live up to their promise to follow the written contract
between the people and the government: the US Constitution.
2001 Ron Paul 7:143
For far too long,
we have accepted the idea that government can and should take care of
us. But that is not what a free society is all about. When government
gives us something, it does two bad things. First it takes it from
someone else; second, it causes dependency on government. A wealthy
country can do this for long periods of time, but eventually the
process collapses. Freedom is always sacrificed and eventually the
victims rebel. As needs grow, the producers are unable or unwilling to
provide the goods the government demands. Wealth then hides or escapes,
going underground or overseas, prompting even more government intrusion
to stop the exodus from the system. This only compounds the problem.
2001 Ron Paul 7:144
Endless demands and economic
corrections that come with the territory will always produce deficits.
An accommodating central bank then is forced to steal wealth through
the inflation tax by merely printing money and creating credit out of
thin air. Even though these policies may work for a while, eventually
they will fail. As wealth is diminished, recovery becomes more
difficult in an economy operating with a fluctuating fiat currency and
a marketplace overly burdened with regulation, taxes, and inflation.
2001 Ron Paul 7:145
The time to correct
these mistakes is prior to the bad times, before tempers flair.
Congress needs to consider a new economic and foreign policy.
2001 Ron Paul 7:147
Why should any of us be
concerned about the future, especially if prosperity is all around us?
America has been truly blessed. We are involved in no major military
conflict. We remain one of the freest nations on earth. Current
economic conditions have allowed for low unemployment and a strong
dollar, with cheap purchases from overseas, further helping to keep
price inflation in check. Violent crimes have been reduced, and civil
disorder, such as we saw in the 1960s, is absent.
2001 Ron Paul 7:148
But we have good
reason to be concerned for our future. Prosperity can persist, even
after the principles of a sound market economy have been undermined,
but only for a limited period of time.
2001 Ron Paul 7:149
Our economic,
military, and political power, second to none, has perpetuated a system
of government no longer dependent on the principles that brought our
Republic to greatness. Private-property rights, sound money, and
self-reliance have been eroded, and they have been replaced with
welfarism, paper money, and collective management of property. The new
system condones special-interest cronyism and rejects individualism,
profits, and voluntary contracts.
2001 Ron Paul 7:150
Concern for the
future is real, because its unreasonable to believe that the
prosperity and relative tranquility can be maintained with the current
system. Not being concerned means that one must be content with the
status quo and that current conditions can be maintained with no
negative consequences. That, I maintain, is a dream.
2001 Ron Paul 7:151
There is growing
concern about our future by more and more Americans. They are
especially concerned about the moral conditions expressed in our
movies, music, and television programs. Less concern is expressed
regarding the political and economic system. A nations moral
foundation inevitably reflects the type of government and, in turn,
affects the entire economic and political system.
2001 Ron Paul 7:152
In some ways I am
pleasantly surprised by the concern expressed about Americas future,
considering the prosperity we enjoy. Many Americans sense a serious
problem in general, without specifically understanding the economic and
political ramifications.
2001 Ron Paul 7:153
Inflation, the
erosion of the dollar, is always worse than the government admits. It
may be that more Americans are suffering than is generally admitted.
Government intrusion in our lives is commonplace. Some unemployed
arent even counted. Lower-middle-class citizens have not enjoyed an
increase in the standard of living many others have. The fluctuation in
the stock market may have undermined confidence.
2001 Ron Paul 7:154
Most Americans still believe
everyone has a right to a free
education, but they dont connect this concept to the evidence: that
getting a good education is difficult; that drugs are rampant in public
schools; that safety in public schools is a serious problem; and that
the cost is amazing for a system of free education if one wants
a real education.
2001 Ron Paul 7:155
The quality of
medical care is slipping, and the benefits provided by government are
seen by more and more people to not really be benefits at all. This
trend does not make America feel more confident about the future of
health care.
2001 Ron Paul 7:156
Let there be no
doubt, many Americans are concerned about their future, even though
many still argue that the problem is only that government has not done
enough.
2001 Ron Paul 7:157
I have expressed
concern that our policies are prone to lead to war, economic weakness,
and social discord. Understanding the cause of these problems is
crucial to finding a solution. If we opt for more government
benevolence and meddling in our lives, along with more military
adventurism, we have to expect an even greater attack on the civil
liberties of all Americans, both rich and poor.
2001 Ron Paul 7:158
America continues
to be a great country, and we remain prosperous. We have a system of
freedom and opportunities that motivate many in the world to risk their
lives trying to get here.
2001 Ron Paul 7:159
The question remains: can we
afford to be lax in the defense of liberty at this juncture in our
history? I dont think so.
2001 Ron Paul 7:160
The problems are
not complex, and even the big ones can be easily handled if we pursue
the right course. Prosperity and peace can be continued, but not with
the current system that permeates Washington. To blindly hope our
freedom will remain intact, without any renewed effort in its defense,
or to expect that the good times will automatically continue, places
our political system in great danger.
2001 Ron Paul 7:161
Basic morality,
free markets, sound money, living within the rule of law, and adhering
to the fundamental precepts that made the American Republic great are
what we need. And its worth the effort.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr020701.htm