Ron Paul Quotes.com
Home Page Contents Congressional Record
25 February 1998
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Wednesday, February 25, 1998
1998 Ron Paul 21:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I would like to recommend to my colleagues the following article by a young writher, R.C. Sproul, Jr., the son of the remarkable theologian and author. While this article is indeed instructive and important in regards to the recent situation with Iraq, I believe that the author does a fine job addressing the much broader topic of following the Constitution in all matters, including those of inciting war and promoting peace. His article was written for CovSyn, which is a publication of the Kuyper Institute, in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
1998 Ron Paul 21:2
Our founding fathers formed our government to ensure that no single person could have complete power or authority over any aspect of government; to give anyone that kind of power is to invite tyranny.
1998 Ron Paul 21:3
I urge my colleagues to read and consider Mr. Sprouls article. We all took an oath to uphold the Constitution: an oath which we must take seriously if we are to promote liberty, peace and civil society.
1998 Ron Paul 21:4
By R.C. Sproul, Jr.
1998 Ron Paul 21:5
Since Vietnam U.S. soldiers have shot at soldiers from other countries, and been shot at, in Libya, Grenada, Panama, Somalia, the former Yugoslavia, and Iraq. And it appears were going to non-war again in Iraq sometime soon. Where, to quote Mr. Dole, is the outrage? How is it that the Constitution can be so brazenly ignored?
1998 Ron Paul 21:6
Some argue that in an age of intercontinental ballistic missiles, that the requirement for a Congressional declaration is outdated. In none of the above non-wars however, have such missiles constituted a treat to American safety. And even if such were the case, why not change the Constitution to reflect the current situation?
1998 Ron Paul 21:7
Others suggest that we have no need for this old rule since we now have the War Powers Act which gives congressional approval for the President to use the military freely within a certain time frame. But thats not at all the same thing. The Constitution no where gives the Congress the right to shirk their role as declarers of war.
1998 Ron Paul 21:8
Still others try to argue that the United Nations security council now serves that role. Again though, the Constitution says nothing about giving them this role. Neither does it say that a sufficient number of handshakes with Madelaine Albright shall be a substitute for Congressional action.
1998 Ron Paul 21:9
And still some go on insisting that these conflicts arent wars. With the U.S.S. Nimitz in the Suez Canal, with 3,000 ground troops being sent to join the 1,500 already in Kuwait, with Stealth bombers lined up and ready to go, this is nonsense. When soldiers shoot at each other, whether theyre in a foxhole, or in a room full of computers, or 35,000 feet in the air, thats war.
1998 Ron Paul 21:10
The only explanation I can think of is that no one really knows what the Constitution says. And while Im not surprised that government school products would be ignorant (how can they know the Constitution when they cant read it?), what frightens me is that each and every soldier, from the buck private loading the cargo planes, to the lieutenants fresh out of ROTC, to the Commander-in-Chief, all of them have take a solemn oath to uphold and protect the Constitution.
1998 Ron Paul 21:11
These United States are no longer operating under the Constitution. We, like those great nations which have come and gone before us, have sunk to the level of empire. And you, friend, are no free man or woman, but just another subject. Remember that as you wave that flag in honor of the bombing heroes.